Measurements of In-Plane Material Properties with Scanning by Carpick R.W., Eriksson M.A.

By Carpick R.W., Eriksson M.A.

Scanning probe microscopy (SPM) was once initially conceived as a mode for measuringatomic-scale floor topography. over the past twenty years, it has blossomed into anarray of recommendations that may be used to procure a wealthy number of info aboutnanoscale fabric houses. aside from friction measurements, thesetechniques have commonly trusted tip-sample interactions directed basic tothe sample's floor. lately, researchers have explored numerous results coming up frominteractions parallel to surfaces, frequently by way of intentionally using a modulated lateraldisplacement. in reality, a few parallel movement is ubiquitous to cantilever-based SPM, due tothe tilt of the cantilever. fresh stories, played involved, noncontact, andintermittent-contact modes, offer new insights into homes reminiscent of structuralanisotropy, lateral interactions with floor good points, nanoscale shear rigidity and contactmechanics, and in-plane strength dissipation. the knowledge won from interpretingthis habit has outcomes for all cantilever-based scanning probe microscopies.

Show description

Read Online or Download Measurements of In-Plane Material Properties with Scanning Probe Microscopy PDF

Best measurements books

Measurement and Instrumentation Principles, Third Edition

'Measurement and Instrumentation ideas' is the newest version of a profitable e-book that introduces undergraduate scholars to the size ideas and the diversity of sensors and tools which are used for measuring actual variables. thoroughly up-to-date to incorporate new applied sciences resembling clever sensors, screens and interfaces, the third version additionally comprises lots of labored examples and self-assessment questions (and solutions).

Cooperating Embedded Systems and Wireless Sensor Networks

A few diversified procedure recommendations became obvious within the broader context of embedded structures over the last few years. while there are a few variations among those, this e-book argues that during truth there's a lot they percentage in universal, fairly the real notions of regulate, heterogenity, instant verbal exchange, dynamics/ad hoc nature and value.

Additional info for Measurements of In-Plane Material Properties with Scanning Probe Microscopy

Example text

123) Here, eq indicates the values at the time teq when the energy densities of nonrelativistic and relativistic matter were equal. We now use the Friedmann equation for k = 0 and w := p/ρ = const. 124) T0 TPl where we used aT = const. 125) . For a typical GUT scale, Te ∼ 1014 GeV , we arrive at the condition N 60. Such an exponential expansion would also solve the flatness problem, another worry of standard big bang cosmology. Let me recall how this problem arises. 126) (ρ includes vacuum energy contributions).

This subject was recently taken up in [21] as part of a program to develop the tools for extracting cosmological parameters, when much extended supernovae data become available. 1 Introduction The horizon and flatness problems of standard big bang cosmology are so serious that the proposal of a very early accelerated expansion, preceding the hot era dominated by relativistic fluids, appears quite plausible. This general qualitative aspect of “inflation” is now widely accepted. However, when it comes to concrete model building the situation is not satisfactory.

80) Now, we make use of the Friedmann equation H2 + k 8π G = ρ. 81) Let us decompose the total energy-mass density ρ into nonrelativistic (NR), relativistic (R), Λ , quintessence (Q), and possibly other contributions ρ = ρNR + ρR + ρΛ + ρQ + · · · . 83) 1 Relativistic Cosmology 23 also holds for the individual components X = NR, R, Λ , Q, · · · . If wX ≡ pX /ρX is constant, this implies that ρX a3(1+wX ) = const. 84) Therefore, 1 ρ = ∑ ρX a3(1+wX ) 0 a3(1+wX ) X = ∑(ρX )0 (1 + z)3(1+wX ) . 88) = 8 × 10−47h20 GeV 4 .

Download PDF sample

Measurements of In-Plane Material Properties with Scanning by Carpick R.W., Eriksson M.A.
Rated 4.07 of 5 – based on 5 votes