By David A. Koplow
Word rigorously the sub-title of this e-book. it's not quite a bit at the info of Non-Lethal guns yet on a number of elements of utilizing them. there's additionally the potential of mis-use, as there's with the rest.
Somewhat unusually, the e-book starts off with attempting to outline Non-Lethal guns, which isn't as effortless to outline as could be anticipated. Rubber bullet weapons, non-lethal at a distance can kill if fired right into a person's head at element clean diversity. and what's non-lethal to a tender robust male is probably not to a baby or aged individual.
From a criminal element, there are overseas treaties relating to chemical guns, which even comprises tear gar, a staple of non-letal guns of the earlier. (Which back, to individuals with respiring problems ....)
There can also be a close examine 5 occasions the place non-lethal guns could have been used, or used another way to solve a scenario. The 5 events are:
The FBI and the Davidians at Waco
The UN and the Rwandan Genocide
The Peruvians and Tupac Amaru in Lima
The Russians and the Chechens in Moscow
The British and the Iraquis in Basra.
Read Online or Download Non-Lethal Weapons: The Law and Policy of Revolutionary Technologies for the Military and Law Enforcement PDF
Best law enforcement books
Making Sense of Transnational Threats: Workshop Reports
Offers the studies from 4 workshops fascinated about tips on how to larger combine substitute research into the analytic method because it pertains to transnational concerns.
Issues In International Relations, 2nd Edition
Concerns in diplomacy second ed. is a transparent and easy, yet stimulating, creation to the main major concerns inside diplomacy within the twenty first Century. Written by means of skilled academics in a jargon-free approach, it assumes no past wisdom of the topic, and permits scholars coming near near diplomacy for the 1st time to achieve self belief in what's a regularly advanced and complicated self-discipline.
To Protect and To Serve: Policing in an Age of Terrorism
For the reason that Sep 11, the specter of terrorism has turn into a key factor in police enterprises during the international. How should still the police switch to counter terrorism threats? What implications do such alterations have for normal duties of the police like battling crime, or within the assets or concentration of contemporary police companies?
The Legacy of Punishment in International Law
This e-book explores the evolution of overseas punishment from a common law-based floor for using strength and conquest to a chain of jurisdictional and disciplinary practices in overseas legislations no longer formerly visible as being conceptually similar.
- More Secure, Less Free?: Antiterrorism Policy and Civil Liberties after September 11
- Horizontal Management
- Groupthink or Deadlock: When Do Leaders Learn from Their Advisors?
- Terrorism Versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response (Cass Series: Political Violence)
Additional info for Non-Lethal Weapons: The Law and Policy of Revolutionary Technologies for the Military and Law Enforcement
Example text
Air Force, Fact Sheet: Active Denial System: Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration, February 2003 (noting that $9 million has been invested in human effects testing of the ADS over the past eleven years); CFR 3, supra note 8, at 25; Mihm, supra note 10, at 38. [ 21 ] 18:6 P1: KAE 0521857589c02 CUNY366B/Koplow 0 521 85758 9 February 8, 2006 18:6 the world of non-lethal weapons effective for the full range of human populations – but that goal is likely to continue to prove as elusive as the real holy grail itself.
International law on non-lethal weapons legitimate objective is only to cause the enemy forces to submit – anything not designed and executed with that objective may be “unnecessary” and therefore “excessive” and illegal. Such a subjective standard, of course, is all but impossible to quantify and is often difficult to assess in any clear fashion at all – but the legal standard remains, and it is a touchstone against which any weapon, including each NLW, must be assessed. ) In some large measure, the inability to be sufficiently precise – the fact that they target wide areas, or cannot be adequately focused on belligerents – underpins the general antipathy to chemical or biological weapons (which may drift uncontrollably from a battlefield into a city), to antipersonnel landmines (which may remain active for years, exploding when triggered by a farmer tilling a field, long after the soldiers have marched away), and to nuclear weapons (which generate such massive destruction that distant noncombatants are inevitably implicated).
Org, visited June 6, 2005. The difference between a “chemical” weapon and a “biological” weapon is elusive. In general, a biological weapon (such as anthrax or smallpox) relies upon living creatures (usually microscopic) or infectious materials derived from them (or on artificially created analogues), which reproduce and cause a “disease” in the targeted person, plant, or animal. A chemical weapon (such as sarin or mustard gas), in partial contrast, uses a substance with direct toxic effects, generally not causing a communicable illness.
